Freedom of speech and the left

471 posts / 0 new
Last post
epaulo13

From Plagiarism to Gaza: Khalil Gibran Muhammad on How a GOP Campaign Ousted Harvard’s Claudine Gay

quote:

KHALIL GIBRAN MUHAMMAD: OK. Well, let me start with the fact that Harvard is the oldest, wealthiest, most prestigious university in this country and globally. So, for almost 400 years, Harvard has systematically excluded white women and people of color, by and large, from its hallowed corridors, from entering its gates. That’s just an absolute fact, a fact that the university, under the previous president, Larry Bacow, admitted to in a report called the Harvard Legacy of Slavery report, that was issued just over a year ago, a report that points out precisely how not only did the university exclude people of color from getting an education, but in fact collected the bodies of Indigenous people and enslaved people for scientific research, and led, into the 20th century, calls for scientific racism that helped to construct the racial hierarchies that we still live with in this country today. That’s Harvard’s own history as a leader.

So the very university that finally arrived at a moment where it not only reckoned with its own history, but also recognized the talent is universal and that the best of us actually have the ability to move this country and world forward, in a time when the planet is literally on fire and most people who will suffer most from that will be people of color, that is the context that brought Claudine Gay to the presidency. And she was ably and excellently qualified for that role. She had proven herself in previous administrative roles as a dean of the largest school on Harvard’s campus.

So, when we put that in context, the affirmative action decision last June was the first victory for the conservative right in this country to dismantle the very possibility that people like Claudine Gay would have the qualifications, the Harvard and Stanford degrees, necessary to take on such positions. And so, within that political context, the attack on affirmative action is one example of what’s been going on, which is 30 years old, a battle. But additionally, and more proximate to this moment, people like Christopher Rufo in late 2020, in response to George Floyd’s killing, have initiated an effort, what we would call a whitelash or a backlash, forms of misinformation to essentially define a body of knowledge known as critical race theory, that is the intellectual basis for understanding how systemic and structural racism work, as anti-American, as Marxist, as a threat to American civilization. And that led to 24 states criminalizing the teaching of history in all its truth about race, about racism, about sex, about gender. That led to the banning of DEI in places like Florida and, to some degree, in Texas.

And what we saw happen here with this campaign against Claudine Gay, where plagiarism became the pretext, kind of like a Black motorist with tinted windows being stopped only to look for drugs so that they could be incarcerated as part of a war on Black people during mass incarceration, that is the context where Christopher Rufo, who initiated the critical race theory, anti-woke campaign, has now culminated in yet another victory with taking down Claudine Gay over a very, very minor offense within academic context......

Paladin1

Quote:
taking down Claudine Gay over a very, very minor offense within academic context

They should absolutely give Claudine Gay a free pass for plagerisim where other students have been kicked out, because she's female and black.

 

 

epaulo13

..your priorities are seriously fucked when you ignore all the words that preceded those. 

Paladin1

Because they were stupid. They're suggesting Harvard et el should over look plagerisim because of  affirmative action. 

Should Harvard get rid of exams for racialized students because of oppression  next?

Maybe Harvard should automatically enroll anyone that identifies as LGBTQ+?

 

epaulo13

..maybe you should get a brain transplant. 

Paladin1

Maybe you should get a spine implant.

JKR

[quote=epaulo13

..maybe you should get a brain transplant. 

[/quote]

Maybe you shouldn’t rely on ad hominem attacks when you can’t logically defend a position?

epaulo13

 So, for almost 400 years, Harvard has systematically excluded white women and people of color, by and large, from its hallowed corridors, from entering its gates. That’s just an absolute fact, a fact that the university, under the previous president, Larry Bacow, admitted to in a report called the Harvard Legacy of Slavery report, that was issued just over a year ago, a report that points out precisely how not only did the university exclude people of color from getting an education, but in fact collected the bodies of Indigenous people and enslaved people for scientific research, and led, into the 20th century, calls for scientific racism that helped to construct the racial hierarchies that we still live with in this country today. That’s Harvard’s own history as a leader.

So the very university that finally arrived at a moment where it not only reckoned with its own history, but also recognized the talent is universal and that the best of us actually have the ability to move this country and world forward, in a time when the planet is literally on fire and most people who will suffer most from that will be people of color, that is the context that brought Claudine Gay to the presidency. And she was ably and excellently qualified for that role. She had proven herself in previous administrative roles as a dean of the largest school on Harvard’s campus.

..so gay ends up on a republican hit list with the end game being dragging the university back to it's past of male white supremacy. the hit list has a chalk board 1 down 2 to go. 

..and then someone thinks that plagerisim is the important issue here.  and someone  else thinks the argument hasn't been made. 

..i use an ad hominem out of shear frustration at the stupidity of the argument made by paladin.

JKR

Harvard University has been around for almost 400 years so of course they're going to have a very checkered past considering the history of racism and genocide during that time in that part of the U.S. that started well before the U.S. was even established almost 250 years ago. Harvard University's long checkered history doesn't excuse Harvard's current leaders from being held accountable for their actions. 

epaulo13

..there is no accounting going on. just more racist abuse on top of more racist abuse. 

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

..there is no accounting going on. just more racist abuse on top of more racist abuse. 

Should non-white students be given a pass when it comes to following rules on plagiarism because of systemic racism?

Michael Moriarity

Norman Finkelstein recently discussed the Claudine Gay firing with Marc Lamont Hill (whose YouTube channel is well worth following, imho). The key point is the power of billionaire donors like Bill Ackman to override academic freedom.

Paladin1

Michael Moriarity wrote:

Norman Finkelstein recently discussed the Claudine Gay firing with Marc Lamont Hill (whose YouTube channel is well worth following, imho). The key point is the power of billionaire donors like Bill Ackman to override academic freedom.

Should non-white students be given a pass when it comes to following rules on plagiarism because of systemic racism?

epaulo13

plagiarism because of systemic racism

..show me the accounting for the systemic racism white supremacy by harvard. or those white supremacist republicans that initiated the attack against gay. plagiarism is being used as cover to perpetuate and continue racism. you can't separate those issues in this situation. 

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:
plagiarism is being used as cover

She was caught plagiarizing on multiple occasions.

How is it being used as a cover when she is guilty of committing that offense??

Should the president of Harvard NOT be held to the same code of conduct as students?

epaulo13

..and in addition no accounting, as finkelstein points out, against the attack by israeli lobbyist to silence any support for palestine on educational campuses.   

epaulo13

..i'm going to say it once more paladin..you can't separate these issues. a black woman is being singled out for accountability in a sea of racists unaccountability.

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

..i'm going to say it once more paladin..you can't separate these issues. a black woman is being singled out for accountability in a sea of racists unaccountability.

I see a black woman who has up until now, NOT been held accountable - where many others have. Her comments regarding jewish students finally put her on the radar loud enough that people took notice. The only reason why anything is being done now is because Harvard risks losing money

"Veritas" indeed.

JKR

[quote=epaulo13

..there is no accounting going on. just more racist abuse on top of more racist abuse. 

[/quote]

Many African Americans are attending and have attended Harvard and many African Americans are very proud
alumni of Harvard.

JKR

[quote=Paladin1

She was caught plagiarizing on multiple occasions.

How is it being used as a cover when she is guilty of committing that offense??

Should the president of Harvard NOT be held to the same code of conduct as students?[/quote]

Obviously the president of a university has to be held to the highest standard of accountability at that university. Students can and are expelled from university for plagiarism. The president of a university has to maintain a much higher standard than a first year student.

epaulo13

highest standard

..yes just like those historical high standards of the past. now can we get back to a little reality. 

..my bold.

 So, for almost 400 years, Harvard has systematically excluded white women and people of color, by and large, from its hallowed corridors, from entering its gates. That’s just an absolute fact, a fact that the university, under the previous president, Larry Bacow, admitted to in a report called the Harvard Legacy of Slavery report, that was issued just over a year ago, a report that points out precisely how not only did the university exclude people of color from getting an education, but in fact collected the bodies of Indigenous people and enslaved people for scientific research, and led, into the 20th century, calls for scientific racism that helped to construct the racial hierarchies that we still live with in this country today. That’s Harvard’s own history as a leader.

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

..yes just like those historical high standards of the past. now can we get back to a little reality. 


The only answer is to look the other way when non-white students break the rules.

The university president should pick and choose what rules they follow.

JKR

[quote=epaulo13

..yes just like those historical high standards of the past. now can we get back to a little reality. 

 So, for almost 400 years, Harvard has systematically excluded white women and people of color, by and large, from its hallowed corridors, from entering its gates. That’s just an absolute fact,…[/quote]

Another absolute fact is that a majority of the students at Harvard are women.

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/10/2/gender-parity-admissions

For the 2022-23 academic year, women and men respectively made up 51 percent and 49 percent of the enrolled class.

Paladin1

Students who submit work that is not their own without clear attribution to its sources will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including mandatory withdrawal from HBS.

They found nearly 50 instances of plagerisim by (former) president Gay IAW with Harvards policy and guidelines.

Fifty.

 

 

6079_Smith_W

This is a funny rabbit hole to get led down, considering there weren't professional calls  for her to be fired for plagiarism, and in fact she was not fired. And I am not sure why this is being spun as being all about plagiarism when it is being openly reported that that is not the main issue here. 

If you look at academic integrity policies for most institutions  expulsion or firing are at the extreme end, and not something that would happen at all without a long process including appeals. 

If you want a reality check, feel free to look at the policy at Queens U:

https://www.queensu.ca/artsci/undergraduate/student-services/academic-in...

"None of the experts called for Gay to be outright fired and they noted it’s very rare for academics or even students to be fired or expelled for plagiarism. "

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/21/business/why-harvard-hasnt-punished-presi...

So this chatter about fairness and  isn't just speculation, it is inaccurate. And to respond to the correct point that people of colour are often targetted with a question about non-whites being "given a pass" is nothing but a smear and a denial of systemic racism.   This wasn't about consequences for academic misconduct; it was about using those incidents to embarrass her for more substantial reasons that even media are talking openly about:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/01/03/claudine-gay-resig...

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/03/books/review/claudine-gay-harvard-res...

Speaking of reality checks, apparently plagiarism and lying on your CV doesn't disqualify someone from becoming foreign minister... if they want you for the job.

https://www.politico.eu/article/german-greens-leader-baerbock-self-criti...

If someone doesn't, then evidently it is a hanging offense.

JKR

She wasn't just an academic at the university, she was the head of the university that was the main representative of the whole university. Her job was to represent the university and put it in a very good light. Instead for very many she put the university in a negative light. That ran completely against her position as being the head of the university.

epaulo13

Powerful donors managed to push out Harvard’s Claudine Gay. But at what cost?

Amid accusations of plagiarism and continuing outrage among Harvard’s major donors at her alleged failure to condemn Hamas and defend Israel, Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, has announced her resignation.

Harvard’s secretive board of overseers, known as “the Corporation”, apparently insisted on it.

“After consultation with members of the Corporation,” Gay wrote in her resignation letter, “it has become clear that it is in the best interests of Harvard for me to resign so that our community can navigate this moment of extraordinary challenge with a focus on the institution rather than any individual.”

quote:

In a 12 December statement, the Corporation said that after conducting an investigation into the first set of such charges, it had found “a few instances of inadequate citation” in two articles, which it said would be corrected, but that the infractions did not rise to the level of “research misconduct”.

A particularly troubling aspect of Gay’s resignation concerns the apparent clout of wealthy Harvard alumni, who were angry with Gay for not coming out more clearly against Hamas and in defense of Israel.

Kenneth Griffin – who earned billions on Wall Street and has donated more than half a billion dollars to Harvard ($300m this year alone, enough to get Harvard to name its graduate school of arts and sciences after him) – was particularly enraged by a statement made by several Harvard student organizations shortly after the 7 October Hamas attack, holding Israel responsible.

Griffin called the head of the Corporation, Penny Pritzker, urging that Gay take a more forceful stand against these students.

Bill Ackman, another Harvard alumnus and major donor, who heads the giant hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management, demanded that Harvard release a list of members of the student organizations behind the letter.

In a string of posts on X (formerly known as Twitter) Ackman said he wanted to ensure that he and other CEOs did not “inadvertently hire any of their members”.

Seth Klarman, another wealthy financier and major donor whose name adorns Harvard buildings, also let it be known publicly that he was upset with Gay’s weak response to the Hamas attack and the student letter.

Lloyd Blankfein, former chief executive of Goldman Sachs, said: “Given the use of Harvard’s name by Hamas-supporting student groups, it was a grave mistake not to condemn the hate messages more quickly and absolutely.”

That’s only a partial list of major Harvard donors incensed at Gay.

Their ire intensified after a 5 December congressional hearing in which Representative Elise Stefanik – herself a Harvard graduate and former Republican mainstream conservative turned pro-Trump Maga Republican – ambushed Gay, along with two other university presidents – Elizabeth Magill of Penn and Sally Kornbluth of MIT......

epaulo13

.." the corporation" secret board. hmmmm....

..sounds transparent.

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

Their ire intensified after a 5 December congressional hearing in which Representative Elise Stefanik – herself a Harvard graduate and former Republican mainstream conservative turned pro-Trump Maga Republican – ambushed Gay, along with two other university presidents – Elizabeth Magill of Penn and Sally Kornbluth of MIT......

Do you think students in Canada calling for the genocide of First Nations on school property should be considered harassment and bullying? Or does it depend on the context?

epaulo13

..i see you on the top of your conservative game now paladin. 

JKR

[quote=Paladin1
Do you think students in Canada calling for the genocide of First Nations on school property should be considered harassment and bullying? Or does it depend on the context?[/quote]

Gay’s biggest mistake was not adequately defending Harvard’s Jewish students and staff against antisemitism.

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

..i see you on the top of your conservative game now paladin. 

I guess "it's different" when it comes to First Nations?

Calling for their genocide is bullying and harassment (and hate speech)
Calling for the genocide of Jews means different things depending on context.

kropotkin1951

JKR wrote:

Gay’s biggest mistake was not adequately defending Harvard’s Jewish students and staff against antisemitism.
That was the same mistake that Corbyn made. Fascist Zionists who support Likud, or the any of the other far right parties in his coalition, use antisemitism as a weapon against left wing people around the globe. Politics Trumps religion when it comes to fascists.

Here is the US lobby promoting Israel that is actively seeking to defeat left wing people based on one issue, how much do they support Israel. American women can forget about the autonomy over their own bodies. A lobby with one issue is going to defeat most of the representatives standing up for their rights.

https://www.aipac.org/about

Paladin1

kropotkin1951 wrote:
JKR wrote:

Gay’s biggest mistake was not adequately defending Harvard’s Jewish students and staff against antisemitism.
That was the same mistake that Corbyn made. Fascist Zionists who support Likud, or the any of the other far right parties in his coalition, use antisemitism as a weapon against left wing people around the globe. Politics Trumps religion when it comes to fascists.

Here is the US lobby promoting Israel that is actively seeking to defeat left wing people based on one issue, how much do they support Israel. American women can forget about the autonomy over their own bodies. A lobby with one issue is going to defeat most of the representatives standing up for their rights.

Were you allowed to plagiarize your work in law school?

epaulo13

..there is another very important factor in getting gay out. not just anyone could have created such an event. they were rich. quite filthy rich as they say. lower and middle class people would never have even appeared as a blip on the secret board of the premier ivy league school. where the children of the ruling class go to be shaped.  

..people that buy politicians...governments in fact. people who make money from war and the destruction of the planet. the kind of folks that have brought us near self destruction. 

..the kind of people we don't want making decisions for us. yet some can only see hamas and are ready to go along with this. 

6079_Smith_W

 

Paladin1 wrote:

Do you think students in Canada calling for the genocide of First Nations on school property should be considered harassment and bullying? Or does it depend on the context?

Hmmm... genocide? or a question of context?

I'm glad you are reading posted articles, Paladin. Not so glad (though not surprised at all) that your motive seems to be nothing more than gathering troll bait.

Of course it depends on context, and not just because in order to harass or bully you actually have to direct a comment at a person or group. If it is something written in an academic paper it doesn't necessarily meet that bar.  And that goes double for those who might want to stretch the definition to include asking occupiers to leave stolen territories.

And double again for satire.

As for what is and isn't hate speech, look at the comments of David Ahenakew that did not meet the definition.

So I wasn't surprised that very one of the people asked that question by the hostile Republican committee said it depends on context. Gay was the one who added that under their policy they act when it turns to harassment or bullying, in case you noticed.

Speaking of policies, do you have any real examples to give a bit of context to your stupid question, or is it just a thin attempt to suck people down another rabbit hole? Personally I think it would be a good idea if that kind of harassment was taken seriously... and I am not talking about the claims of passive aggressive white people.

kropotkin1951

Paladin1 wrote:

Were you allowed to plagiarize your work in law school?
I would be given due process not run out of town because of rumors. Not all minor citation lapses lead to any repercussions and few lead to expulsion.

Rights

Hearings provide an opportunity for a balanced airing of the facts before an impartial board of decision-makers in a timely manner. All hearings of alleged academic misconduct will respect the rights of members of the USask community to fair treatment in accordance with the principles of natural justice. In particular:

Without derogation of the President’s authority under s. 79 of the Act, a student against whom an allegation of academic misconduct is made is to be treated as being innocent until it has been established, on the balance of probabilities, that they have committed an act of academic misconduct.
The parties have a right to a fair hearing before an impartial and unbiased decision-maker. This right includes the right for either party to challenge the suitability of any member of the hearing board based on a reasonable apprehension of bias against the complainant’s or respondent’s case. The hearing board will determine whether a reasonable apprehension of bias exists.
The complainant and the respondent have a right to bring an advocate (which may be a friend, advisor, or legal counsel) to a hearing, and to call witnesses.
The hearing board has the sole authority to determine whether the student has committed an act of academic misconduct.

https://governance.usask.ca/student-conduct-appeals/academic-misconduct....

https://governance.usask.ca/student-conduct-appeals/academic-misconduct....

Paladin1

kropotkin1951 wrote:
I would be given due process not run out of town because of rumors. Not all minor citation lapses lead to any repercussions and few lead to expulsion.

What about nearly 50 minor citation lapses? Did any of your peers rack up that many and go on without repercussions?

6079_Smith_W

Paladin1 wrote:
kropotkin1951 wrote:
I would be given due process not run out of town because of rumors. Not all minor citation lapses lead to any repercussions and few lead to expulsion.

What about nearly 50 minor citation lapses? Did any of your peers rack up that many and go on without repercussions?

Here's a novel idea. How about you look that one up and tell us?

But I suppose that wouldn't have the same effect as goading other people into chasing their tails doing your research for you - on something you completely made up.

Paladin1

6079_Smith_W wrote:

Here's a novel idea. How about you look that one up and tell us?

You want me to look up which of kropotkin1951's peers plagiarized their work in law school?

Uh, okay.

kropotkin1951 what school did you take law in and what years were you there?

6079_Smith_W

Yeah: "uh, okay".

See how stupid a question it is?

Why do you think he would know any more than you? And why do you think it is his job to make your case for you?

 

Paladin1

6079_Smith_W wrote:

Why do you think he would know any more than you?

Why do I think he should know more about his peers during his time in school than me?

Well, because he was there and I wasn't? lol

Like, do you not understand the physics at play here? I'm going to guess you know more about YOUR peers in school than I know about your peers in school lol.

I asked if any of his peers were caught plagiarizing in school 50 ish times - that's something someone would remember.

6079_Smith_W

Why would any U of S student know that?

Do you imagine they put them in the stocks in the bowl?

I don't know if you went to university, but I have no idea who if anyone faced accusations of plagiarism when I went. It isn't the sort of information they post. With good reason - it isn't criminal, therefore no one's business.

More to the point, you haven't offered up fuck all in the way of evidence or research here. all you are doing is asking insinuating and racist questions that don't have anything to do with Christine Gay's resignation, because she never faced any formal calls for firing because of plagiarism.

Paladin1

6079_Smith_W wrote:

I don't know if you went to university, but I have no idea who if anyone faced accusations of plagiarism when I went.


People talk, maybe they just didn't talk to you very much. I knew of a few people getting caught cheating and plagiarizing.

Quote:
It isn't the sort of information they post. With good reason - it isn't criminal, therefore no one's business.


See above.

Quote:

More to the point, you haven't offered up fuck all in the way of evidence or research here.


She's being accused of nearly 50 cases of plagiarism.

Go look at the examples for yourself
Despite Support From Corporation, Harvard President Gay Under Fire Over Plagiarism Allegations
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/12/12/allegations-plagiarism-gay...

6079_Smith_W wrote:
asking insinuating and racist questions

Examples please.

6079_Smith_W

responding to an article pointing out systemic targetting of non-whites with a baiting question asking people here whether they think non-whites should get special treatment.

Michael Moriarity

kropotkin1951

My University does publish statistics as part of its due process. It does seem that normally the punishment is an F on the plagiarized piece. Of course all those students also have the right to be presumed innocent prior to a hearing and the right to an appeal of a decision if they disagree with it.

If one was interested in the subject they could look at any University and find much the same procedural guarantees and statistics.

Misconduct and Academic Appeal Cases 2016-17
Student Misconduct
The policy on Student Discipline, approved by University Council and University Senate in
2012, provides a framework of principles for dealing with student misconduct in both academic
and non-academic matters.
Academic Misconduct
2016-17 statistics:
Number of academic misconduct cases heard by colleges:
48 allegations involving 49 students
(Previous year: 43 allegations involving 44 students)
Number of students found guilty:
43 students
(Previous year: 36)
Breakdown of allegations:
Plagiarism: 24
Other types of academic misconduct: 19
Penalties:
Expulsions: one (under appeal at the university-level)
Suspensions: three
Other penalties:
- In most cases the student was given zero in the assignment or exam, plus an
additional penalty of 4% to 15% off the final grade.
- One instance where a grade of 50% was assigned for the course
- Once instance where a grade on 0 was assigned for the course
- Two instances where the student was required to repeat the class/practicum
- One instance where the student was required to write a letter of apology to the student
whose work they had plagiarized
- One instance where the student was required to develop a presentation on Academic
Integrity
- Two instances where a student was required to discontinued from their academic
program
- One rewrite of assignment
- One instance where a student was required to take a workshop on proper referencing
techniques
- Two instances where a formal letter of reprimand were placed on the students’ file
Additionally, starting January 1, 2017, the regulations on Student Academic Misconduct have a
process for recording informal resolutions for complaints of academic misconduct. There were
48 informal resolutions to incidents of academic misconduct. There of these 27 were related to
instances of plagiarism.

https://governance.usask.ca/documents/student-conduct-appeals/stats/Hone...

 

 

Paladin1

6079_Smith_W wrote:

responding to an article pointing out systemic targetting of non-whites with a baiting question asking people here whether they think non-whites should get special treatment.

That's not a baiting question. The premise of those posts were that plagiarism wasn't really a big deal and so what if she forgot some citations in passages that looked practically cut and paste from other peoples work - people just have a problem with it because she's black.

So I'm asking if the colour of her skin should grant special privilege when it comes to citing sources.

At the end of the day she was the president of the 2nd most prestigious university in the world, and the 2nd most hardest university to get into.

Her work should be flawless, her behaviour beyond reproach. It wasn't.

If this was Canadian and it was someone in a position of authority suggesting calls for genocide against First Nations was only harassment and bullying "depending on the context" you would be singing a different tune.

Paladin1

kropotkin1951 wrote:

My University does publish statistics as part of its due process. It does seem that normally the punishment is an F on the plagiarized piece. Of course all those students also have the right to be presumed innocent prior to a hearing and the right to an appeal of a decision if they disagree with it.

I recalled reading something about Gay being accused in the past for plagiarism and that it was swept under the rug. I can't find the article where I read it so there's a good chance I misread something and formed an ill-informed opinion based off of that. It looks like the first time she was accused of plagiarism was only in December.

Did you read the article I posted from the Harvard Crimson? If so, do those examples of Gay's articles vs others articles not look nearly identical to you?

6079_Smith_W

Responding to racial overpolicing by asking if non-white people should get a pass on obeying the law  is a racist sentiment, in that it is a clear denial of systemic racism.

Maybe you should read the article again... for comprehension. It didn't say anything about not expecting the rules to apply to non-white people. It said the plagiarism accusation was the pretext for calls for her dismissal.

If your bottom line is following the rules, how about the university's due process? There were no formal calls for her dismissal over plagiarism accusations. Not from the university, nor from any academic professional.

And there have been a examples here of people who have admitted to plagiarism but were not removed from their jobs. So clearly it isn't a case of non-white people getting special treatment, as you frame it.

She was singled out for her political values; she was an easy target because she is non-white and a woman, and the plagiarism accusation was a good way to add fuel to the fire.

Is there a rule somewhere that says if you are caught plagiarizing you must lose your job? If you can find one then you might have a serious argument. But there isn't, and you don't.

And given that there are white people who have been caught and kept their jobs it isn't at all a case of non-whites getting special treatment, shocking as it might seem.

Pages