Defund the police

305 posts / 0 new
Last post
epaulo13
Defund the police

DEFUND THE POLICE

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We, the creators of this website want to honour and thank the original caretakers for their continued protection of the land. Modern-day settlers may recognize these city names as home, but these names may not have the same significance for Indigenous peoples. This land has had many names and the boundaries that determine citizenship and settler privilege only have meaning because of engrained participation.

Historically the RCMP was created to displace Indigenous peoples for colonizers and settlers. Policing is tied into the fabric of our society and is a continuation of these colonial efforts. Indigenous people continue to face this harassment and violence daily.

This is an ever-evolving land acknowledgment. We will continue to be creative in finding ways to encourage action and discussion on this website and in our lives. The website will evolve as these discussions continue. We encourage settlers to think about how they can examine what action they can take to go beyond engaging with this website.....

epaulo13

..scroll down to transcript

A made-in-Canada blueprint for defunding police

Last week, a group of community activists and scholars in Halifax released a 217-page report—the most detailed blueprint yet issued on how to defund, disarm, and dismantle the police in Canada.

The group, serving as the Define Defunding Police subcommittee of the Board of the Police Commissioners, was chaired by professor El Jones, and conducted public consultations and gathered more than 2000 responses to an online survey.

The report provides a plan for how to redirect funding from police to a variety of organizations, agencies and community groups, and outlines strategies to pursue police accountability.

The Breach’s Senior Video Producer Sara Wylie spoke to Tari Ajadi, one of the report’s authors, by video.  Ajadi is an activist and PhD candidate in Political Science at Dalhousie University who has published articles in The Globe and MailThe Chronicle-Herald, and The Tyee

The interview has been lightly edited for concision.

An interview with Tari Ajadi, co-author of Halifax’s new report envisioning how to defund and “detask” the police.....

epaulo13

..pdf file

Defunding the Police:

Defining the Way Forward for HRM

epaulo13

Winnipeg Police Cause Harm

Winnipeg Police Cause Harm is a community-centred police abolitionist group committed to defunding the Winnipeg Police Service and reallocating resources to life-sustaining services.

epaulo13

..police as enforcers

The Institution that Remains: the Manitoba Developmental Centre and Disabled Confinement in Manitoba

Institutions, be it prisons, personal care homes, group homes, or psychiatric institutions are designed to segregate, isolate and invisibilize disabled people, particularly those labelled with intellectual/developmental disabilities. These institutions are unique, but are intricately woven together with carceral logic–which rationalizes confinement and control.

The Manitoba Development Centre (MDC) is one of the last two remaining large-scale institutions for people labelled with intellectual/developmental disabilities in Canada. For well over a century it has been used to forcibly remove disabled people from their communities and isolate them. The provincially operated institution has inflicted violence on disabled people who have spent lifetimes incarcerated in the MDC.

quote:

Labour and Deinstitutionalization

While most institutions across Canada closed in the 2000s, including BC, Ontario and Alberta, in 2004, the NDP government in Manitoba invested $40 million into upgrades of MDC. How did Manitoba become the national face of institutionalization and confinement of disabled people?

Liat Ben-Moshe’s Decarcerating Disability draws the important parallels between the role of labour unions organizing in maintaining institutionalization and incarceration. In Manitoba, the Manitoba Government and General Employees’ Union (MGEU) perfectly demonstrates the connection between institutionalization and incarceration.

MGEU is the leading force for the defense and proliferation of carceral spaces across the province. MGEU represents 32,000 workers, 360 of which are employed at the MDC, and 120 of whom are employed in prisons. This is but a fraction of their large workforce, yet MGEU has spent considerable hours invested in their proliferation.

James Wilt and Bronwyn Dobchuk-Land examine the role of MGEU in Manitoba’s growing carceral landscape, noting that “...while the trend toward punishment and securitization is not unique to Manitoba, the MGEU is a key piece in solving the puzzle of how new jails and police have become a project of the social democratic left.”

quote:

MGEU has levelled two primary arguments to justify the institutionalization of disabled people in Manitoba. The first, carceral ableism, which justifies that some level of disability requires institutionalization. To do so, MGEU relies on the narrative that the people incarcerated are too disabled and too complex to live in community, a blatant lie used to justify incarceration. There is no level of care, no form of disability that requires incarceration....

epaulo13
epaulo13

Support the Defund the Police by 50% Campaign

SURJ is organizing to support the demand from Black Lives Matter Toronto to defund the Toronto Police Services by 50%. The movement to defund the police is growing. By mobilizing and empowering residents of Toronto to organize their communities, we believe we can demonstrate the widespread support of that movement. We need to pressure councillors to consider a budget that reflects a shift towards a future free from unjust systems of policing, violence, and carceral approaches to justice.

Toronto Councillors will debate and vote on the budget on February 17, 2022.

The Toronto Police Service is asking for an increase in their budget – we can’t let that happen! We must demand that our councillors dramatically change the City’s funding priorities to reflect what's needed. By reallocating money away from the police and de-tasking police, we can reduce harm and over-policing, while addressing Toronto’s inequities by properly funding housing, and public community services.

You can make a difference. Be a part of our movement to invest in community.

Want to make a presentation or written submission to the Toronto Budget Committee?

Depute on Monday, January 24 and Tuesday, January 25, 2022 (via zoom). You can also submit your written comments to Budget Committee by email. Learn more at the City of Toronto site here.

Douglas Fir Premier

But if we defund the police, how will we be able to protect the police from other police while they're policing?

Ottawa police employees told an independent investigator that police workplace culture continues to penalize them for reporting their colleagues' bad behaviour, that women are sexually objectified and that racialized officers are unfairly scrutinized for the same behaviour of their white counterparts.

The findings come from a workplace assessment jointly commissioned by the police board and police service as part of their efforts to address internal workplace sexual violence and harassment.

Employment law firm Rubin Thomlinson LLP was hired to conduct a pilot project in 2020. That project was first launched in May of that year, just months after one of the service's own deputy chiefs was charged with misconduct for allegations of sexual harassment and unwanted touching. Deputy Chief Uday Jaswal now faces charges related to three female employees.

[...]

In a statement this week the service and board said they would work to implement a multi-year "safe workplace action plan."

That plan, Sloly said, "is the next step in our ongoing efforts to prevent these harmful workplace incidents from occurring — to increase member confidence in reporting incidents — to provide improved supports to affected victims/survivors – and — to address all such incidents head on when they do happen."

The program is expected to cost approximately $8.2 million over its first five years of operation, with annual costs projected to decrease year over year.

epaulo13

..wow!

Pondering

Anyone who wants to abolish police will be written off as a nut case. 

epaulo13

Let’s re-imagine a new system

As public outrage at police brutality grows, a movement to redirect public resources away from traditional policing has taken hold around the country. Now, we take a look at a few of the real-world alternatives to the police services.

quote:

VIOLENT CRIME

One common refrain in opposition to defunding the police assumes that our society will not be able to effectively respond to violent crime. But we have to remember that police do not prevent violence. In most incidents of violent crime, police are responding to a crime that has already taken place. When this happens, what we need from police is a service that will investigate the crime, and perhaps prevent such crimes from occurring in future.

Policing is ill-equipped to suit these needs. When victims are not the right kinds of victims, police have utterly failed, and at times refused to take the threat seriously. Why would we rely on an institution that has consistently proven that it is rife with systemic anti-Blackness and other forms of discrimination that result in certain communities being deemed unworthy of support? Instead of relying on police, we could rely on investigators from other sectors to carry out investigations. Social workers, sociologists, forensic scientists, doctors, researchers, and other well-trained individuals to fulfill our needs when violent crimes take place.

Police intervention into an ongoing violent crime is rare. But, In the event that intervention is required while a violent crime is ongoing, a service that provides expert specialized rapid response does not need to be connected to an institution of policing that fails in every other respect. Such a specialized service does not require the billions of dollars we waste in ineffective policing from year to year.

Paladin1

Pondering wrote:

Anyone who wants to abolish police will be written off as a nut case. 


You're right, it's a super ridiculous notion.
What people should be pushing for is police reform and civilian oversight with actual legal powers.

epaulo13

..from another thread. this is the role of the police as set out by the federal gov. with input from the provinces. and as we see in the natural resource sector a tool for corporations.

..this is not an issue of reform it's an issue of the control of people by the powers that be. we can't via representative democracy control those powers that be but it is still possible to make change at the municipal level via direct democracy.  

Canadian police expanding surveillance powers via new digital “operations centres”

Jan 13 / 2022

Canadian police have been establishing municipal surveillance centres to support law enforcement, deploying digital technologies that expand surveillance powers with the help of major US corporations, according to government documents seen by The Breach.

Working around-the-clock in special rooms or wings of police stations, these so-called “real-time operations centres” are the cornerstone of a shift to confront what police call the “new challenges” of a digital age.

They are intended to provide “virtual backup” for police officers in any situation, supplying them with information drawn from deep social media monitoring, private and public closed-circuit televisions (CCTV), open-ended data collection, and algorithmic mining. 

Over the last 10 years, the surveillance centres have been quietly set up within police forces from Halifax to Vancouver, with no public debate about their functions, corporate relationships, or impacts. 

Described by police as “force-multipliers,” they are already being used to monitor demonstrations. And analysts and experts are warning that the reliance on digital surveillance tools, and databases filled with details drawn from practices like carding, risk “supercharging” discriminatory and racist patterns of policing when delivered to officers in real-time.

According to government documents, the centres are modeled after fusion centres created by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security post-9/11. The U.S. fusion centres, which began with a focus on combatting terrorism but later expanded to criminal and political activity, have been criticized for indiscriminate surveillance and civil rights violations..... 

Paladin1
epaulo13

epaulo13

..from vancouver 4all

The DSV demands Vancouver City Council cut the VPD’s budget in 2022 by at least 50% and invest instead in community-based services

Sign this form if you pledge to help cut the VPD Budget by 50% in 2022.

Paladin1

epaulo13 wrote:

Under a disarmed VPD who would respond to violent people carrying weapons?

kropotkin1951

Paladin1 wrote:
epaulo13 wrote:

Under a disarmed VPD who would respond to violent people carrying weapons?


Many countries have police forces whose regular officers are not armed but with specialized units to deal with the occasional violent event.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-where-the-police-force-doe...

"The governments of countries such as Ireland, for example, believe that their unarmed police forces can are effective because in essence law enforcement is reliant more on moral authority than brute force or access to extensive weaponry."

epaulo13

..have a look at post #11

Paladin1

kropotkin1951 wrote:
Paladin1 wrote:
epaulo13 wrote:

Under a disarmed VPD who would respond to violent people carrying weapons?


Many countries have police forces whose regular officers are not armed but with specialized units to deal with the occasional violent event.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-where-the-police-force-doe...

"The governments of countries such as Ireland, for example, believe that their unarmed police forces can are effective because in essence law enforcement is reliant more on moral authority than brute force or access to extensive weaponry."

I believe all police officers in Northern Ireland are armed. Glock17s, MP5s, G3 and HK33 rifles. Heavy stuff (They're authorized to carry off duty as well.)

Ireland complete has about 26% of officers authorized to carry guns.

In the UK police are becoming more and more armed, and the support for routine arming police as they call it is going up.
Police there also routinely respond to domestic and other call-outs armed with firearms.

Norway and NZ cops don't carry guns but the guns are stored in their car. So basically within arms reach.

kropotkin1951

Our model of all officers being heavily armed, at all times, does not appear to be any real norm.

Given the avoidable deaths that this system leads to it is clearly time to revision "police" work.

epaulo13
Paladin1

kropotkin1951 wrote:
Our model of all officers being heavily armed, at all times, does not appear to be any real norm.

I completely agree with you. When you start arming and dressing police up like soldiers they're going to act like soldiers and that's not who we need policing Canadians.

Quote:
Given the avoidable deaths that this system leads to it is clearly time to revision "police" work.

Again I completely agree. Watching armed police officers abuse and assault unarmed and at times helpless Canadians is infuriating.

epaulo13

..6 min video

Angela Davis: Abolishing police is not just about dismantling. It's also about building up

The nationwide protests that started in response to the police killing of George Floyd have evolved into a movement calling for defunding of the police. "Defunding the police is not simply withdrawing funding for law enforcement and doing nothing else. … It is about shifting public funds to new services and new institutions," says Angela Davis, legendary Black liberation activist and preeminent scholar of abolitionist thought. "Abolition is not primarily a negative strategy. It's not primarily about dismantling, getting rid of — but it's about re-envisioning, building anew. And I would argue abolition is a feminist strategy, and one sees in these abolitionist demands that are emerging the pivotal feminist theories and practices."

Pondering

epaulo13 wrote:
..emphasis on new  

<p><a href="https://defundthepolice.org/alternatives-to-police-services/" style="box-sizing: inherit; background-color: rgb(250, 250, 250); transition: color 110ms ease-in-out 0s; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold; outline: dotted thin; font-family: &quot;Tamil Sangam MN&quot;, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Fira Sans&quot;, &quot;Droid Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, &quot;sans-serif&quot;; font-size: 20px;" target="_blank">Let’s re-imagine a new system</a></p>

I agree with some points but not others. Bad or weak arguments undermine the stronger ones as the concept is dismissed.  Demilitarize the police would be a better slogan. 

The first argument about responding to mental health crisis is good but goes too far. Mental health professionals do not want to deal with potentially violent patients without police back-up. They, not the police should lead the response but police can't be eliminated from the equation. Even unarmed people in mental crisis can be dangerous. 

Traffic services, the example used was a car chase. In Montreal police are not permitted to launch car chases unless the car is threatening lives. Getting caught by police is a deterrence to breaking traffic rules. Without police there would be a lot more speeding. Police circulating means they can respond to ongoing crimes faster. 

Violent crime, even if it appears over, requires police response. The expectation that armed police will come motivates the attacker to run rather than waiting for their arrival. Rapid response to ongoing violence requires distributed services. Police on patrol responded to the Dawson shooting. The first officer was there for unrelated reasons but fortunately was armed. 

Gender based and domestic violence have not been solved by police but when they are called to intervene a social worker would not do. If a woman escapes armed police will escort her back to pick things up. 

Police are meant to provide investigation services for us in the event that we experience a theft or burglary or a similar crime. We are inundated with television shows that tell us that police provide expert detective services to bring perpetrators of these kinds of crimes to justice. But these stories are myths and an unjust way to think about the risks that people take when they are living in precarious conditions.

That's an unreasonable expectation. Police act mainly as a deterrent and first response to burglary not as investigators. Investigation is limited to bigger crimes. They will investigate a stolen car exporter not a single car theft. 

We do need to reimagine what we need police for and how best to allocate crime prevention and response dollars. For example, the homeless suck up a lot of resources in emergency services. It would be more cost effective to house them. That doesn't mean it makes sense to fire police to do it. 

Our entire policing system from federal to provincial to local should be subject to efficiency audits but that is true of all government departments. 

epaulo13

..i don't agree with anything you have just said pondering. but that's ok because it will be decided at the community level after much discussion and debate. it will not go forward without support of the community. and that is key imo. where as in the here and now there are zero choices. and we are spied on and repressed.  

epaulo13

Angela Davis: Abolishing police is not just about dismantling. It's also about building up

..from the video

ANGELA DAVIS: Well, the call to defund the police is, I think, an abolitionist demand, but it reflects only one aspect of the process represented by the demand. Defunding the police is not simply about withdrawing funding for law enforcement and doing nothing else. And it appears as if this is the rather superficial understanding that has caused Biden to move in the direction he’s moving in.

It’s about shifting public funds to new services and new institutions — mental health counselors, who can respond to people who are in crisis without arms. It’s about shifting funding to education, to housing, to recreation. All of these things help to create security and safety. It’s about learning that safety, safeguarded by violence, is not really safety.

And I would say that abolition is not primarily a negative strategy. It’s not primarily about dismantling, getting rid of, but it’s about reenvisioning. It’s about building anew. And I would argue that abolition is a feminist strategy. And one sees in these abolitionist demands that are emerging the pivotal influence of feminist theories and practices.

..and this

ANGELA DAVIS: Well, I want us to see feminism not only as addressing issues of gender, but rather as a methodological approach of understanding the intersectionality of struggles and issues. Abolition feminism counters carceral feminism, which has unfortunately assumed that issues such as violence against women can be effectively addressed by using police force, by using imprisonment as a solution. And of course we know that Joseph Biden, in 1994, who claims that the Violence Against Women Act was such an important moment in his career — the Violence Against Women Act was couched within the 1994 Crime Act, the Clinton Crime Act.

And what we’re calling for is a process of decriminalization, not — recognizing that threats to safety, threats to security, come not primarily from what is defined as crime, but rather from the failure of institutions in our country to address issues of health, issues of violence, education, etc. So, abolition is really about rethinking the kind of future we want, the social future, the economic future, the political future. It’s about revolution, I would argue.

epaulo13

..that davis video came from a broader discussion which can be found here.

..i absolutely love how she connects the dots so we can see the larger picture. when she talks black i see indigenous. 

quote:

ANGELA DAVIS: Yeah, racism is integrally linked to capitalism. And I think it’s a mistake to assume that we can combat racism by leaving capitalism in place. As Cedric Robinson pointed out in his book Black Marxism, capitalism is racial capitalism. And, of course, to just say for a moment, that Marx pointed out that what he called primitive accumulation, capital doesn’t just appear from nowhere. The original capital was provided by the labor of slaves. The Industrial Revolution, which pivoted around the production of capital, was enabled by slave labor in the U.S. So, I am convinced that the ultimate eradication of racism is going to require us to move toward a more socialist organization of our economies, of our other institutions. I think we have a long way to go before we can begin to talk about an economic system that is not based on exploitation and on the super-exploitation of Black people, Latinx people and other racialized populations.

But I do think that we now have the conceptual means to engage in discussions, popular discussions, about capitalism. Occupy gave us new language. The notion of the prison-industrial complex requires us to understand the globalization of capitalism. Anti-capitalist consciousness helps us to understand the predicament of immigrants, who are barred from the U.S. by the wall that has been created by the current occupant. These conditions have been created by global capitalism. And I think this is a period during which we need to begin that process of popular education, which will allow people to understand the interconnections of racism, heteropatriarchy, capitalism.

Pondering

epaulo13 wrote:

..i don't agree with anything you have just said pondering. but that's ok because it will be decided at the community level after much discussion and debate. it will not go forward without support of the community. and that is key imo. where as in the here and now there are zero choices. and we are spied on and repressed.  

Exactly, and there doesn't seem to be any plan on how to get enough public community support to make change happen unless what you mean by community is activists.

I agree with India Walton. The left is terrible at communication. There is nothing nuanced about defund and abolish police. Saying, "but wait, that isn't exactly what we mean" is pointless because by then nobody is listening.

Sure "defund" gets people's attention but it's negative attention. Everything you say after that is dismissed. You might as well try and convince Canadians that Canada should be a communist country. You just aren't taken seriously. Worse, it gives the left a bad name sending people running for the centre because both the left and the right threaten stability.

You can convince people to revolt in a democracy, but it has to be for what they want. Just my opinion, but the left seems to ignore what most people actually want in favor of promoting what the left wants them to want coupled with scare stories.

epaulo13

..and i don't agree with anything you just said once again. and i'm glad for that because if i was to agree..things would never change. or have any hope of changing.

 

Paladin1

There was an insightful video taken on the scene where Seattle protesters took over city blocks to create police-free 'autonomous zone' in 2020.

An assault was taking place and you can hear people in the video shouting where are the police and someone call the police.

 

 

epaulo13

..one other point pondering. context is everything. the walton comment was made in order to try and move the left forward. you on the other hand have weaponized the comment to attack the left.  

epaulo13

[quote=Paladin1]

There was an insightful video taken on the scene where Seattle protesters took over city blocks to create police-free 'autonomous zone' in 2020.

An assault was taking place and you can hear people in the video shouting where are the police and someone call the police.

..if your looking for a pure movement that has no contradictions your on the wrong discussion board. not to say that that comment you heard was some kind of capitulation by someone who wants defunding.

kropotkin1951

I was inside the Woodward's squat and the Olympics protest site in the past when they were occupied by protestors. Both those communities used unarmed security from within their ranks to keep the peace. Mutual aid includes helping keep the peace.

Pondering

epaulo13 wrote:

..one other point pondering. context is everything. the walton comment was made in order to try and move the left forward. you on the other hand have weaponized the comment to attack the left.  


Not at all. I want the left to listen to her. Stop ignoring her. Take her advice.

Only the left has solutions but only wins the little battles never the big ones. Neoliberalism continues to reign and we the left keep repeating ourselves running in circles hoping to get somewhere new. We celebrate 1$ transit fares for seniors in Montreal while the planet burns. We need dramatic radical change. That will not happen while the left keeps plodding along doing the same old stuff.

JKR

I think a very strong argument can be made that the word “defund” is very counterproductive:

Defund the Police” Is a Self-Destructive Slogan: Especially if you want to reform law enforcement; slate.com; BY WILLIAM SALETAN; NOV 18, 2020

--------

For two weeks, Democrats have been arguing over why they didn’t do better in the election. Was it socialism? The Green New Deal? Bad organizing online? These disputes will rage on. But there’s one lesson on which all sides should agree, because the evidence is clear, and the remedy is semantic: Stop saying “Defund the police.”

Most activists, when they talk about defunding police, mean that we should fund social services and thereby reduce the scope of what police have to do. But that’s not how many voters hear it. Defund is generally applied to organizations you want to cripple or eliminate, not reform. So it’s easy to seize on this phrase to paint Democrats as anti-police and pro-crime. And that’s what Republicans did in campaigns across the country, including key Senate races in MaineIowaNorth CarolinaSouth Carolina, and Georgia. In all these races, the Democratic candidates opposed defunding law enforcement. But the slogan stuck to them anyway, because they were associated with politicians or activists who had used it.

...

The biggest gains, however, come from talking about how your plan would control crime and improve policing. In June, a Reuters/Ipsos poll asked about “proposals to move some money currently going to police budgets into better officer training, local programs for homelessness, mental health assistance, and domestic violence.” That idea outpolled “Defund the police” by 72 points. In September, a Detroit News poll asked likely voters in Michigan whether they would “shift some funding that currently goes to the police and invest that money in other areas that might help fight crime like mental health assistance, job assistance, education, homelessness and drug abuse prevention.” That formulation outpolled “Defund the police” by 77 points.

--------

epaulo13

HOW TRANSFORMATIVE JUSTICE RESPONDS TO VIOLENCE WITHOUT THE CARCERAL SYSTEM

quote:

But this newfound hunger for abolition is accompanied by questions and concerns about how to implement abolition in practice. People wonder how society would hold people who commit violence accountable for their actions, and in particular, use sexual violence as an example.

One way abolitionists have confronted these questions is through the development of Transformative Justice (TJ) processes. These processes, which have roots in Indigenous practices, model a different set of skills and principles for approaching harmful and dangerous situations.

Abolitionists argue we should eliminate all forms of policing and incarceration, and instead fund life-giving, community-based social services. They understand that properly executing such services requires shifting values and resourcing the development of valuable relationship skills to give communities the tools they need to disrupt and intervene in patterns of harm. That’s where TJ comes in.

What Is Transformative Justice?

Abolition is not a new idea; it’s been theorized, practiced, and advocated for by Black feminists like Angela Davis, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, and Rachel Herzing for decades. They argue the carceral state emphasizes individual acts of harm, labeling those who commit harm as criminals to justify dehumanization, isolation, and punishment.

As demonstrated by the violence of policing, as well as the demographics of incarcerated populations, this is a mechanism of control over the most marginalized in American society: Black and brown people, Indigenous people, and often those who are poor, trans, sex-working, and/or disabled.

Those same people are proposing ways to exist and solve problems outside of this violent system.

In other words, abolitionists identify the punishment bureaucracy as a source of harm itself. Leila Raven is a queer mama, prison abolitionist, and organizer with Decrim NY and Hacking//Hustling, who points out that “a thousand people are killed by police every year, Black people are three times as likely to be killed as white people, and half of those killed are people with disabilities. Sexual assault is also the second most common form of police brutality, primarily used against Black women and women of color who are also frequently criminalized for the strategies that we use to survive.”

While the state is actively harming folks at the margins, transformative justice seeks to do the opposite.

According to Mia Mingus, a writer, educator, and community organizer for disability justice and transformative justice, the process is “a political framework and approach for responding to violence, harm and abuse. At its most basic, it seeks to respond to violence without creating more violence and/or engaging in harm reduction to lessen the violence.”

Je’Kendria—a fat, Black, disabled, non-binary femme who is the Executive Director of Collective Action for Safe Spaces (CASS)—argues TJ  necessitates an understanding that the carceral system does not actually protect or heal survivors, but rather “thrusts [them] into cycles of harm and trauma.”

Like other abolitionists, she points out that sexual harm is still so prevalent despite having carceral systems in place. Not only is sexual violence prevalent within the carceral system, but she says that most rapists are not actually incarcerated. Instead, many have “prominent positions of power.”

Erin Gar-Yun Andriamahefa is a queer, genderfluid, Malagasy, Chinese person, who volunteers with CASS. She describes TJ as a framework through which people can begin to understand and address why harm is happening, while emphasizing collective responsibility to seek accountability when it happens.

It is a humanizing process, she told Shadowproof, that “equips us to move beyond shame and punishment to normalize navigating conflict, seeing it as a portal for accountability, transformation, and healing.”

CASS facilitates the creation of such a portal to accountability, transformation, and healing. Je’Kendria describes the organization as a small grassroots group that “trains and supports communities, workplaces, bars/restaurants, and collectives in building safer environments that address harassment and assault through an intersectional, anti-carceral lens.”

By prioritizing the survivors’ consent, safety, and healing, TJ ensures that carceral culture and systems aren’t recreated within communities.

quote:

It’s not easy work, as it requires us to focus on ‘killing the cop in our heads’ and owning when we commit harm or enable others to do so. As we begin to actualize a world without police and prisons, we have to do the work to build communities of trust, with infrastructures of care to prevent the resurgence of carcerality as a solution.

epaulo13

An Indigenous Abolitionist Study Guide

Introduction

On August 10, 1975, the first Prisoners’ Justice Day (PJD) took place at Millhaven Penitentiary in Bath, Ontario, in commemoration of Eddie Nalon, who took his own life one year earlier while incarcerated.

Every year since, prisoners throughout so-called Canada (as well as internationally) have engaged in day-long fasts and labour strikes to call attention to the lethal effects of the prison system and to honour those who have died. PJD provides us with an opportunity to reflect upon and act in resistance to the inherent violence of prisons and the penal apparatus (i.e., police, social workers, etc.), and to interrogate the colonial logics of containment and control that underpin this apparatus. 

In settler states such as Canada, the justice system is an integral component of settler colonial warfare against Indigenous peoples. As the sources in this reading guide make clear, the criminalization, segregation and containment of Indigenous peoples is a deep-seated, ongoing process designed to remove Indigenous peoples from their lands, communities, families, laws, cultures, and languages. Prisons are a colonial imposition on Indigenous lands.

As Ojibwe Elder Art Solomon explains, “We were not perfect, but we had no jails… no old peoples’ homes, no children’s aid societies, we had no crisis centres. We had a philosophy of life based on The Creator, and we had our humanity.” An abolitionist future, then, must center the stories of this land as essential to collective flourishing and care.

As of late, there has been increased public consciousness around penal abolition and an exciting turn toward the possibility of a world without prisons. We have seen the release of many useful reading lists and guides that provide a sense of the rich history of abolitionist theory and organizing, particularly as informed by the work of Black feminists. An Indigenous Abolitionist Study Guide adds to this corpus, gathering together the work of Indigenous organizers and scholars, and addressing the need for an explicitly Indigenous, anti-colonial abolitionist analysis of the penal system.

Such an analysis illustrates the necessity of defunding and dismantling the punitive, carceral structures characteristic of settler colonial society, and turning, instead, to Indigenous Knowledges as a guide to how to create and sustain good relations with each other.....

Pondering

That's all great if all we want to do is be right.  If you want to convince people to actually move towards a system like that it has to be sold in tiny bites otherwise it is just dismissed as extremist. 

I guess that is one of the major differences between us. For me the goal is to change the system now or within 10 years. If we can get a sane government in place everything else will follow. 

https://www.mic.com/articles/109138/sweden-has-done-for-its-prisoners-wh...

Sweden's prison system boasts impressive numbers. As the Guardian notes, in the past decade, the number of Swedish prisoners has dropped from 5,722 to 4,500 out of a population of 9.5 million. The country has closed a number of prisons, and the recidivism rate is around 40%, which is far less than in the U.S. and most European countries....

BUT

There are many factors that contribute to the effectiveness of their prison systems compared to many other countries in the West. They are relatively inclusive societies with widely shared prosperity and a low degree of corrosive racial tension (mainly due to racial homogeneity). But the low rates of return to prisons in particular hints at an alternative model for how to treat prisoners.   

That bolded part is why solutions that work well for some countries or communities don't work well for others.  It's why some parents want to raise their children in homogenous communities.

I believe that we shouldn't have political parties as they currently exist. I think all House of Common reps should be independent so they will reflect the will of their communities not a political party. Political parties would exist as teams of up to 10 people and all top ministerial positions would be determined before the election. Trying to actually achieve it would be an exercise in futility. 

Convincing the general public to abolish police forces is an exercise in futility. We don't even take decent care of foster children. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_minority

Over seven million Canadians identified as a member of a visible minority group in the 2016 Census, accounting for 22.3% of the total population. This was an increase from the 2011 Census, when visible minorities accounted for 19.1% of the total population; from the 2006 Census, when visible minorities accounted for 16.2% of the total population; from 2001, when visible minorities accounted for 13.4% of the total population; from 1996 when the proportion was 11.2%; and over 1991 (9.4%) and 1981 (4.7%). In 1961, the visible minority population was less than 1%. The increase represents a significant shift in Canada's demographics related to increased immigration since the advent of its multiculturalism policies.

Indigenous people represent about 5% of the population of Canada.

Currently something like 20% of Canadians were not born in Canada and we are increasing immigration. Police will not be abolished in Canada for at least 50 to hundred years if ever. It's an intellectual exercise not a goal.

That police have failed to eliminate crime is not a convincing argument. Laws backed by police serve as a deterrent to crime.

Not having homogenous communities makes it much harder to get everyone on the same page. Restorative justice is gaining in popularity and being applied where people think it makes sense. Abolishing police in a society like ours is not possible. We can't even abolish hand guns. 

epaulo13

Toronto’s first-ever mental health crisis response teams — without police — to launch in March

Toronto’s long-awaited civilian-led mental health crisis response teams are set to take to the streets within weeks.

The city unveiled new details on its non-police mental health crisis response effort, on Wednesday, including a revised launch date of March for two of four planned pilot teams, and an ask of an additional $8.5 million in funding this year to help them run.

The Community Crisis Support Service teams are the first of their kind in the province, and will dispatch nurses and mental health support workers instead of police officers to respond to 911 calls about people in crisis.

They were approved unanimously by City Council last February after growing protests against police brutality and the death of Regis Korchinski-Paquet, an afro-Indigenous Toronto woman who died in police presence during a mental health crisis call in May 2020.

The first two pilots will launch in the city’s northeast and downtown east area in March, while the remaining two in the northwest and downtown west will launch in June — areas flagged as having the highest need. Details were released in a proposal that is scheduled to go before the city’s executive committee next week....

epaulo13

..that 8.5 million could come from the police budget.

epaulo13

..and here's the protest that forced the city to act. 

Black Lives Matter Toronto issues 27 demands for reform in major anti-police protest

“Defund the police!”

Thousands of people, led by Black Lives Matter Toronto, came together to paint the message in larger-than-life hot pink lettering on College St. outside of the city’s police headquarters.

It’s a key demand of people who have taken to the streets to speak out and fight back against anti-Black and anti-Indigenous racism.

Next to it, the group painted the names of Black and Indigenous people who have been killed by police or have lost their lives in the presence of police.

Regis Korchinski-Paquet’s name is there; she fell to her death from a balcony last month during an interaction with Toronto police....

epaulo13

Women’s organizations denounce VPD spin on arrest outside women’s center; renew calls for real safety in face of increasing gender-based violence

(Xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish) and səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh)/Vancouver, B.C – Women’s organizations in the Downtown Eastside renew calls for community-led safety following an arrest made outside the Downtown Eastside Women’s Center.

The calls for action come after the Vancouver Police Department sent a press release on January 17, sharing details of an arrest made near the Women’s Center where a man wielding a knife attempted to enter.

“It was our staff’s quick actions, experience, and training, not police action, that kept women safe from any potential harm, and we reject the VPD attempting to turn this into a media opportunity to look like heroes,” said Executive Director of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Center, Alice Kendall. “In their own press release, the VPD acknowledge that the man had already dropped the knife and walked away.”

Women’s organizations in the DTES continue to see sexualized and gender-based violence daily. Women and front-line staff respond and deal with, aggressive and violent predators and incidents that often remain unreported. When police say, “many violent crimes go unreported in the Downtown Eastside,” this is a painfully long-standing and well-known fact to women and women’s organizations. Fear of further retaliation, or of repercussion due to engagement in criminalized and stigmatized activities such as sex work or drug use, is real and extremely harmful.

The VPD’s press release is particularly egregious given that every day we witness how current policing practices, such as coordinated street sweeps, do not contribute to women’s safety and just waste municipal resources.

“We also witness how ongoing disappearances and reports of missing women, particularly Indigenous women and girls, muster grossly inadequate responses from the VPD and RCMP. Despite a provincial inquiry and a national inquiry into the crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls, trans and two-spirit people, there is no recognizable change in policing practices nor adequate supports for communities and families who are searching for their loved ones,” further states Kendall.

The Downtown Eastside Women’s Center, along with the WISH Drop-In Centre Society, Battered Women’s Support Services, and Atira Women’s Resource Society, are renewing calls for a community-led coordinated response. One year after expressing outrage of the ongoing sexualized and gender-based violence in the neighbourhood and no discernible outcome, we are once again calling on all levels of government for an action plan.....

Pondering

A witness called 9-1-1 just after 1 p.m. yesterday after the 31-year-old suspect followed a woman into the Columbia Street community centre and began uttering threats while holding a large knife.

VPD officers were close by and responded to the 9-1-1 call. The officers arrested the suspect nearby, after he tossed the knife and walked away.

The police were honest about what happened and there are no reports of brutality in the arrest.  Seeing as the women are claiming they could and did handle it themselves why did they call the bad guys with guns? What is the complaint about the announcement the police made? Seems the women just wanted an excuse to bash police. Sometimes they deserve it. This time they didn't. 

Would the mental health care team respond to a knife-wielding individual without police?

Concerning  Korchinski-Paquet. Two of the emergency calls from her family stated she had a knife. They wanted her forcibly removed and admitted to hospital against her will. They were afraid of her. No mental health care team would respond to that without police protection. 

It is an excellent idea to have a roving team of healh care professionals but it is very misleading to suggest they would respond to armed people experiencing a mental health crisis without police protection. 

If the people don't have weapons then sure that makes sense. Health care professionals should still go if the individual is armed to try to deescalate but they are not a replacement for police. Would they have told police not to allow Korchinski-Paquet back into the apartment alone or would they have insisted on guards going to the bathroom with her to make sure she didn't escape to the balcony? 

What would a mental health care team do if the mentally ill person refuses to leave with them? That's what police were called to do. 

I doubt police respond to mental health care crisis that don't involve danger. 

Saturday’s statement from Korchinski-Paquet’s family also rejects a comment made by Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders, who said on Friday that at least two of the three calls made to police on Wednesday night mentioned knives.

“The family states that when the police arrived and spoke with Regis, (her mother) Claudette and (her brother) Reece, there was no knife present and no assault taking place,” the statement read. “The family strongly believes that Regis’s death could have been prevented.

Calls to police are recorded. If there was no mention of a knife I doubt police would have brought it up. They didn't attack her. They had her out in the hall. She asked to go back in to use the bathroom and they let her because they were not afraid of her or for her. As Mom said, she didn't have a knife. She gave everyone the impression she was willing to go or had accepted that she was going to hospital. She tricked police and her family. 

Blaming police makes about as much sense as blaming her family. 

The death of Regis Korchinski-Paquet, a 29-year-old Indigenous-Ukrainian-Black Canadian woman, occurred in TorontoOntarioCanada on May 27, 2020. Responding to multiple 911 calls from Korchinski-Paquet, her mother, and her brother, for a domestic disturbance involving punches, thrown bottles, and knives, police attended her apartment. Subsequent to the arrival of police, Korchinski-Paquet fell to the ground 24 storeys below, and died at the scene.[3] Her family accused the Toronto Police Service of having played a role in her death, which led to a Special Investigations Unit (SIU) investigation. The SIU announced in late August 2020 it had cleared all police officers of wrongdoing and found no evidence of police involvement in her death.[4]...

Around 5:15 pm, Korchinski-Paquet's mother called police to their 24th story apartment in High Park North after a domestic conflict. Her mother wanted officers to take Korchinski-Paquet to CAMH, in an effort to deescalate the situation so it would not become unsafe. Six officers attended the scene. However, officers were confused as to whether epilepsy was justifiable reasoning for taking her into custody under the Mental Health Act.[7] In a call to 911 by Korchinski-Paquet herself, she claimed that both her mother and brother had been drinking since 10am that morning.[8][9]

The Toronto Police Service's Chief at the time, Mark Saunders, clarified that the call was for an assault, stating that three separate people had called in and that knives were being drawn at the scene,[10] limiting the responding teams that could be sent to assist the situation.[11]

When police arrived at the apartment, they were met by Korchinski-Paquet, her mother, Claudette Beals-Clayton, and brother, Reece Korchinski-Beals, in the hallway and exchanged a few words with the officers as they walked down the hall.[5] Shortly after, Korchinski-Paquet told officers she needed to use the bathroom and was followed into the apartment by multiple officers, who would not allow entry by other family members.[12]

Korchinski-Paquet proceeded to walk out onto the 24th-floor balcony and prevented officers from joining her by holding the door closed.[13] She began to scale the balcony in an attempt to cross to the adjacent balcony, which was blocked off by netting. She lost her balance on the railing and fell to her death.[13][7][14]

One officer congruently knocked on the neighbour's door to attend to the second balcony, only to find it was blocked off by netting. He looked down and noticed Korchinski-Paquet's body on the ground, immediately calling for an ambulance.[13] Korchinski-Paquet's mother was then heard telling a neighbour that her daughter jumped.[13]

Korchinski-Paquet was pronounced dead at the scene.[13]

When three separate people call 911 claiming knives, punches and broken bottles are involved along with mental illness there is no way a mental health care team will respond without police protection. 

The "left" is just as bad as Fox news twisting information to blacken their enemies. It backfires. People find out the truth and you lose support.

epaulo13

Committee tasked with defining 'defunding police' releases final report

A committee created to define what it means to defund the police has released its final report, touting widespread reforms to Halifax Regional Police practices, oversight and accountability.

The work of the committee, created by the Halifax Board of Police Commissioners in August 2020, is the culmination of an extensive public consultation process and research by committee members and its support team.

Committee chairperson El Jones, a well-known community activist and educator, said the 219-page report is just the beginning of what she hopes will be ongoing public engagement in reforming policing in Nova Scotia's capital and beyond.

"It's not the last word. It's certainly not a final stopping place," Jones told CBC Radio's Mainstreet on Friday.

"We believe we have started up a very important process that is allowing communities, service providers, representatives of the police and government to really engage seriously, not even necessarily with the idea of defunding police, but the broader conversation around public safety, prevention and what makes our communities livable and healthy."

quote:

The public consultation process included a survey with 2,351 unique responses. It showed 56.8 per cent of respondents expressed support for the idea of defunding the police, while 43.2 per cent did not.

Support for defunding was higher among women and gender diverse people than among men.

epaulo13

..more on the committee

Growing support for defunding of police prompts city to define defunding

quote:

“Consider where we put our money”

The Subcommittee’s report relies on data from the 2019 “Street Checks” report, which University of Toronto criminologist Scott Wortley did for the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission. 

Wortley concluded “the Halifax Regional Police force’s use of street checks disproportionately affected Black people in the municipality.” 

Street checks are the practice of police identifying or collecting information at a random stop site, to be entered in a database for future use. Wortley found that Black people are six times more likely to be stopped at a street check than white people. 

In a 2003 decision, the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission found police committed racial discrimination when they pulled over former boxer Kirk Johnson several times, for no reason. 

El Jones and the other authors of the defunding report want society “to consider where we … put our money, recognizing that we resource the things that we value.” Nova Scotians, they say, should “consider whether there are better, more effective options for addressing and intervening to address crime and social harm.”

Part of the process the subcommittee recommends is called de-tasking, which means: “identifying roles or functions of the police that they are not equipped to do, and transferring those tasks to the appropriate service provider, agency, or organization.”

The subcommittee argues that “policing—and the use of force—does not prevent harm, often does not meet the needs of victims (particularly in cases of sexual assault or domestic violence), and does not adequately rehabilitate or reintegrate those who have caused harm.”

Key to understanding the roots of police inequity, the subcommittee writes, is the policing of Indigenous peoples, land, and resources. 

quote:

All 36 recommendations in the subcommittee’s report have been endorsed by Wellness Within, a Nova Scotia non-profit organization “working for reproductive justice, prison abolition, and health equity.” 

epaulo13

ENDORSEMENT OF THE DEFINING DEFUNDING THE POLICE REPORT

Wellness Within welcomes and fully endorses the recently released report Defunding the Police: Defining the Way Forward for HRM, prepared by the Board of the Police Commissioner’s Subcommittee to Define Defunding Police.

Wellness Within’s work and advocacy is deeply rooted in our commitment to decarceration and defunding the police. We have called on Halifax to defund, disarm, and dismantle the Halifax Regional Police and Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Policing in Canada is founded on colonialism and is characterized by racism, misogyny and homophobia/transphobia. Too often police are responsible for, violent arrests of parents in front of their children, and the mishandling of sexual assault files.

We urge HRM council to adopt all recommendations put forward in this report. The recommendations to create and fund a third-party reporting program to refer survivors of sexual assault to a non-police community organization and to address funding gaps in sexual assault prevention and response programs are especially welcome and should be a high priority for council.

We look forward to collaborating with HRM council to envision a future beyond policing for our city. 

Paladin1

Knives are more dangerous than they're given credit for. Controlled studies by the police (FBI I believe) found that it took 21 feet distance for an officer to pull out their pistol and shoot someone charging at them with a knife (from standing still). It's very easy to quickly bleed out if an artery is knicked.

This no police MH crisis team sounds pretty neat but I'm guessing police will be on call in the vicinity ready to respond. The second the team suspects the person is aggressive or dangerous they're just going to step back and call the police.

epaulo13

..maybe. but there is this.

quote: 

“It was our staff’s quick actions, experience, and training, not police action, that kept women safe from any potential harm, and we reject the VPD attempting to turn this into a media opportunity to look like heroes,” said Executive Director of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Center, Alice Kendall. “In their own press release, the VPD acknowledge that the man had already dropped the knife and walked away.”

epaulo13

 ..what i am learning on a personal level is that there is a "policeman in my head" as stated above. and i do need to rehabilitate or transition that policeman. 

..and while i began this thread on the basis of the violence that the police cause i'm now catching a glimpse of where this "transitioning" is headed. and i like it. 

..in the pages that i have looked at and not yet posted there is an explosion of areas connected to abolition such as safety, accountability, justice and healing. there are more in other areas. it is exciting to be seeing all this moving forward.  

Pondering

Reform is not abolision. I think it is great and amazing that police commissioners were onboard with lowering their budgets under a defund the police banner.

epaulo13 wrote:

..maybe. but there is this.

quote: 

“It was our staff’s quick actions, experience, and training, not police action, that kept women safe from any potential harm, and we reject the VPD attempting to turn this into a media opportunity to look like heroes,” said Executive Director of the Downtown Eastside Women’s Center, Alice Kendall. “In their own press release, the VPD acknowledge that the man had already dropped the knife and walked away.”


Yes there is that. In what way did police make themselves look like heroes? I don't want an opinion I want to know what the police did that was objectionable.
I quote:
“In their own press release, the VPD acknowledge that the man had already dropped the knife and walked away.”

What did the police do to position themselves as the heroes?

Pages