Sex Work Issues

15 posts / 0 new
Last post
oldgoat
Sex Work Issues

This continues from this thread    https://babble.rabble.ca/babble/activism/class-struggle?page=3​   which had bifurcated into two seperate yet useful conversations.  I hope this brings clarity to both.

susan davis susan davis's picture

and.... i was too late.... please do not use the term prositution or prostitute

oldgoat

susan davis wrote:

and.... i was too late.... please do not use the term prositution or prostitute

Ok. I shall amend.

susan davis susan davis's picture

Thank you! unfortunately Pondering has been impossible to reason with for more than 9 years.

I went back to see if you were involved in the attacks on Canada's first sex workers Cooperative and you weren't so, i apologize. It was before your time here and was mostly lead by a former member who was banned after revealing his inability to refrain from attacking me personally for being a sex worker.

There were death threats against me attached to links in that thread and the whole shabang.

I will say however, that assertions of increased trafficking, violence and exploitation in New Zealand are false, full stop. All research and information from "ethical and reliable sources" state so.

Links to reports by extreme anti sex work crusaders do not qualify as evidence in this country nor should they be considered while working on the issues facing my community.

Police are not enforcing the law. They state themselves that they only use the law to combat exploitation as the Human trafficking laws are not sufficient. They use the most highly contested section of the criminal code - the Communication Provision - so that victims of exploitation do not have to testify in court.

Perhaps if the Justice Committee had spent more time listening to sex workers during consultations on the Human Trafficking Legislation and less time texting and looking at their phones, we wouldn't be in this position.

But instead we are left with the loudest most privileged voices - anti sex work crusaders - dominating the discourse with no regard for fact or the lives and safety of members of my community.

Pondering, I am a sex worker. I work on these issues every single day. I work with sex workers all over the planet who are being impacted by this ideological war on sex workers.. Because that's what it is, a war against a group of PEOPLE who are mostly WOMEN.

Right now in Parliament and the Senate they are working on legislation to remove adult content from the internet under the guise of "protecting children from porn".

Every sex worker in Canada has adult images in the internet.... that;s where we meet our clients. Even sex workers on street use their phones and on-line ads to earn money.

So, here we go....again.... total exclusion and dismissal of sex workers voices and concerns and movement towards once again narrowing people's choices and forcing sex workers onto the street.... into the hands of predators and to where law enforcement violence via over surveillance and detention are regular occurrences.

Please.... stop promoting myth as fact.... stop trying to undermine efforts to better our lives and safety. Why not join us and fight for our inclusion as citizens of this country?

 

oldgoat

There is about 3 months of babble history that would count as being before my time.  I know who you're talking about.  Either Michell or I banned him,  but I do recall discussing it with her.  I agree though, I'm not sure how many minds there are to be changed.

susan davis susan davis's picture

sorry old goat... yes you were here then. my comment isn't clear enough. Pondering was not here then and I had made a comment that she was part of the Olympic Brothel Debacle, she wasn't so I apologize.

I have come to the conclusion that anti sex work crusaders are zealots, there is no more chance we will change their minds then we could change the minds of other extremeists. they are blind in their faith that they hold the "moral high ground"....

It's unfortunate and is a serious barrier to actually doing something that would impact the levels of violence experienced by sex workers.

Pondering

As I haven't participated in this thread I don't think I should be discussed within it. In particular it is invalid to define my views or label me in any way that I have not labeled myself. This is my first and last post in this thread. 

epaulo13

Overcoming isolation, sex workers are organizing for life-saving reforms

Sex work is among the most dangerous jobs in Canada. But a movement of increasingly-organized sex workers says the dangers they face aren’t inherent to the work. It’s the stigma, myths and criminalization that have made their trade so high-risk.

Jelena Vermilion, a sex worker who is the co-founder and executive director of the Sex Workers’ Action Program in Hamilton, says putting people in conflict with the law makes them more vulnerable to violence and exploitation.

“It’s not that the work itself is vulnerable,” she told The Breach. “It’s that [the law] fosters situations where exploitation and violence and harm can occur.” 

The federal government is dragging its feet on reform. Trudeau’s Liberals have mostly have not parted ways with laws written by Harper’s Conservatives. And despite the efforts of sex worker activists, organized labour still doesn’t see them as a meaningful part of the working class.

Migrant sex workers face additional risks like deportation, in part because of barriers they face in the job market more generally. Indigenous women have also been particularly impacted by anti-sex work laws, according to testimony shared during the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls in 2018.

Even though current legislation makes it illegal for sex workers to organize, they are building power and mobilizing in cities across Canada. Their struggles have reinvigorated a push to change legislation, and to shift the focus away from influential and well-funded messages about human trafficking and the need for police intervention.

Fighting for legal change

Over the past year, the Canadian government has been reviewing the 2014 Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA) — a law opponents say criminalizes sex work and opens sex workers up to further harm, violence and stigma. 

Normally bills like this are subject to review after a five year period, however, that didn’t happen with PCEPA. The review process was initiated only after public pressure from the Canadian Alliance For Sex Work Law Reform (CASWLR), a coalition representing 25 sex work advocacy groups from around the country. In addition, the group filed a constitutional challenge against PCEPA (also known as Bill C-36) last year, and began presenting their arguments to the Ontario Supreme Court this month.

But representatives from the Alliance say the most recent federal meetings on the constitutionality of the law—along with reports the federal government has published as part of their review of PCEPA—are rehashing the same issues brought forward in 2013.

That year, sex workers led a challenge to Bedford vs. Canada, arguing Canada’s anti-sex work laws were unconstitutional. The challengers won, and the laws were unanimously struck down by Canada’s Supreme Court.

Just months after the Supreme Court decision, Harper’s Conservatives enacted PCEPA, putting forth a framework based on the “Nordic Model” that criminalizes clients, advertisers, and third parties—for instance, anyone who helps book, drive, or provide security to a sex worker—while also framing all sex workers as “exploited persons.” 

The third parties criminalized by the law are often members of networks of support that sex workers rely upon and have built as a labour force. Not only does PCEPA characterize sex workers as victims of their own profession, it suggests that any attempt at organizing as the root of that victimhood.

The inability to advertise also forces sex workers to take on potentially more dangerous clients. Criminalizing third parties involved in the process relies on harmful stereotypes like “pimps.” But it also prevents sex workers from organizing alongside one another, or asking non-sex-workers for help with things as simple as making phone calls or booking dates.

“Fundamentally the conversation is just still very peppered with this idea of trafficking being the same thing as sex work,” said Angela Wu, project manager at the Vancouver-based Supporting Women’s Alternatives Network (SWAN). 

Wu describes the PCEPA hearings as disheartening given that the federal Liberal Party hasn’t considerably shifted away from Conservative policies, as illustrated in its most recent Committee Report......

epaulo13

..more from above.

Connecting struggles

SWAN is one of two organizations in the country that focuses on supporting the health and safety of immigrant and migrant sex workers. The organization offers frontline outreach in person and online, individual support like referrals or translations (in Cantonese or Mandarin), and has created an abuser registry, as well as doing education and advocacy.

In addition to calling for a full repeal of PCEPA, SWAN is calling for the repeal of sections of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations. These rules “unfairly put migrant workers at elevated risk of violence and make them unable to report these incidents without fear of deportation,” said Wu. This was one area the federal government did agree with, and recommended in their recent findings

A publication co-authored by SWAN and the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women earlier this year pinpoints some of the barriers to entry into the labour force for non-status migrants. The report connects immigrant and migrant sex worker struggles to those of immigrant and migrant labourers across the country. 

“[Sex work] is the best way they can earn a living to support their families because of language barriers, they don’t have status, [and] they can’t use their credentials from their home country,” said Wu in a phone interview with The Breach. 

“There are so many barriers for them to actually be in the labour force legally,” she said. “We really take that approach of not just wanting to decriminalize [sex work], because there are so many other issues relating to labour as well.” The report identifies language, education, transferable work experience, and gender as intersecting barriers to enter the workplace. 

Elene Lam, the executive director of Butterfly Asian and Migrant Sex Workers Support Network, a Toronto-based national grassroots organization that’s also part of CASWLR, agrees. 

“Instead of taking away options, how about you create more options for people in life and they can decide to do it or not, instead of punishing the workers with laws that endanger their safety,” said Lam. 

Like SWAN, Butterfly offers health and safety support, and does outreach and advocacy for immigrant and migrant sex workers. Butterfly organizes alongside sex workers to mobilize and build labour power in their community. “These workers keep [telling us]: ‘this is my work, this is my choice. This is what I want to do,’” said Lam.

Wu and Lam agree that sex workers’ agency is undermined during proceedings like the federal government’s consultations on PCEPA, where the positions of police and anti-trafficking think tanks are given equal weight to the lived experiences of sex workers.

“This is supposedly a law about sex workers and the sex worker community, but their voices are not being valued and respected,” said Lam in a phone interview with The Breach......

epaulo13

..yet more.

quote:

Increased risks for Indigenous sex workers

Lanna Moon Perrin is one of the applicants challenging the constitutionality of PCEPA alongside the CASWLR. She’s a sex worker, artist and activist based in Sudbury, ON. 

During the Knowledge Keeper, Expert and Institutional Hearings on Sexual Exploitation for the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls, Perrin spoke out against the anti-trafficking laws and detailed how they harm Indigenous sex workers and can push them into riskier situations where they may be trafficked or experience violence. 

“This whole trafficking scare has really made it hard for women, particularly Indigenous women in the sex trade industry to do our work safely, because now we have to hide from police, we have to go places that are more isolated, to advertise our services is even more tricky,” Perrin said in her deputation at the 2018 hearings.

“We’re being pushed and pushed further into isolation, further into dark places to hide our work. When we’re being pushed into isolation, it gives ample opportunity for those situations where we can become victims.” 

Indigenous scholars and legal experts have cited the Indian Act as a central influence on how sex work is policed in Canada today. Naomi Sayers of Garden River First Nation is a sex work advocate and lawyer. 

Sayers has written about how the Indian Act criminalized Indigenous women as prostitutes, and defined Indigenous homes as “bawdy houses,” a term meaning “brothel” that was only repealed from the Criminal Code in 2019 (and therefore appears in PCEPA’s original drafting). 

Indigenous women considered “Indian” before the law could be criminalized for the mere “intent to engage in prostitution,” according to Sayers. 

In addition, Indigenous residences were referred to as “bawdy houses,” a term meaning “brothel” that remained in the criminal code until 2019, which stated that anyone living in such a dwelling was engaged in or intending to be engaged in prostitution. 

“This provision operates in a similar way to the communication provisions as well as the bawdy house provision in PCEPA (i.e., being present in an area known for prostitution),” wrote Sayers in 2016.

A violent attack in Hamilton

In June, a sex worker was violently attacked and sexually assaulted on Barton Street in Hamilton, leaving her in a coma and critical condition. 

The Sex Workers Action Program (SWAP) runs a physical drop in space not far from where the assault occured, and where many street-based sex workers in the city operate. After the attack, the SWAP held a vigil and fundraiser for the woman, who is still in the process of rehabilitation, and is now relearning how to walk. 

Every Saturday, the SWAP holds drop in hours, during which people are free to use the space to rest, wash up, do laundry, access therapy, restock on harm reduction supplies, and learn about the history of sex worker struggle through the organization’s archive. 

Vermilion, who co-fouded the SWAP, sees laws like PCEPA harming street-based sex workers in particular, since they are often the most maligned, even within the profession. 

“There can often be a hierarchy, even laterally, within the industry,” said Vermilion. “Sex workers themselves can sort of pit themselves against each other or consider themselves better or worse because of [the kind of work] they engage in.” 

Stigma and the perpetuation of it is the reason why Vermilion and others organizing for decriminalization instead of the legalization of sex work in Canada.

“What [legalization] would also do is create a tier of legal and illegal sex workers, where the restrictions or requirements that would be necessary to be considered a ‘legal’ sex worker, would be inaccessible for some poor, working class sex workers,” she said......

epaulo13

..finally. 

quote:

Fickle, absent support from the left

The stigma around sex work followed Vermilion into her foray as a delegate of Industrial Workers of the World’s (IWW) Hamilton chapter, which she joined around the time of SWAP’s founding in 2018. She took part in the chapter’s duties and started educating members to the concerns and struggle of sex workers. 

However, when she shared her sex work website in an article for the IWW, she says she was banned from holding office within the organization for five years. In the process her civilian name might have also been leaked, which she says could prevent her from crossing the border into the United States. 

“The effect of all of this is, I don’t trust working with them again,” she says of the IWW.

Vermilion believes that pervading stigma is the reason why labour organizations like the IWW or traditionally left-leaning political parties like the NDP don’t have stronger stances on the issue of sex work as a labour issue. 

“A lot more union bodies need to explicitly talk about how sex work is work. Sex work is not human trafficking, sex work is not inherently violent or exploitative and that until we change the law, we cannot even start to reduce and cumulatively improve those working conditions,” she told The Breach.

Though NDP MP for Esquimalt-Saanich-Sooke Randall Garrison is closely aligned with the CASWLR and requested the PCEPA review that’s now underway, the party isn’t unequivocal in its support or understanding of sex work in relation to exploitation. 

The labour-friendly Communist Party of Canada has unsuccessfully run the same anti-sex work candidate, Nigel Cheriyan, in Hamilton Centre for the past federal and provincial elections. That’s the same riding where the street-based sex worker was violently attacked this summer. 

During CASWLR’s September press conference, national coordinator Clamen reaffirmed the Alliance’s disappointment with inaction not only on the part of the Liberal government, but also from the NDP and Green Party. 

She pointed out that PCEPA prevents sex workers from negotiating with third parties, which is a barrier to labour organizing. “With this case we’re talking about freedom of association, and when we talk about freedom of association, for sex workers to not only work together but get access to labour mechanisms, and associate in ways that other industries do,” she said. 

“For local labour councils, activists and unions that are operating across Canada there’s nothing stopping you right now from reaching out and connecting with your local sex worker justice organization and taking the position that sex work is a real and valid form of work,” said Ellie Ade Kur. 

Ade Kur is a sex work organizer in Toronto who organizes with Maggies, one of Canada’s oldest sex-worker-led organizations. Member groups involved with CASWLR have made an effort to reach out to labour organizations, she said, to no avail.   

Considering how sex work is the site of various struggles, it seems like an important venue for support from left parties and organizations. But sex workers and sex work advocacy groups are still waiting for the left to show up for their rights......

epaulo13

susan davis susan davis's picture

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-why-feminist-organizatio...

Clearly, something is changing in the world of Canadian women’s advocacy: a growing recognition that to truly support the most marginalized women – women of colour, migrant women and impoverished women among them – we must support sex workers and the decriminalization of their work.

Leaders in the women’s sector admit that Canadian feminism still has a long way to go if it is to truly repair the damage it has caused to sex workers. Anuradha Dugal, vice-president of the Canadian Women’s Foundation, says that the CWF’s previous position on sex work was “influenced by a certain kind of white liberal feminism. … It came from a place of privilege.” Emilie Coyle, director of the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies, similarly states that the organization must now “grapple with the harm” its previous stance on sex work has caused.

But a common thread amongst these groups is a growing understanding of intersectionality: an understanding of how race, class and other social experiences affect different women’s lives in different ways. While white, middle-class values have traditionally influenced the mainstream feminist movement’s desire to prohibit sex work, an intersectional perspective acknowledges how criminalization can plunge Black, Indigenous and migrant women living already precarious lives into further uncertainty.

epaulo13

..cool!

ryanw

I didn't think the utilization of sex worker services was so widespread until I sat down with a group of unhappy 40+yr old dudes and found I was the only one without a story, with many seeking liasions every week or more frequently.

Growing up there might have been one guy; or friends getting a dance in a club, but no specific point of reference to warn me of my unavoidable future of becoming a 'dirty old man'. That's really my own POV and not a barb at lonely people.

I'm not conflicted by own conscience in trying to uphold competing and contrary feminist values when I'm working as a nurse at point of contact for patients. My role is only to identify trafficked persons and refer them to a forensic nurse for secondary assessments if they are so inclined.

Almost all of my training and career history is working with mental illness and episodes that manifest after developmental, situational or direct trauma.

I have been having a dialogue with my daughter who was buying opiates recently. I hope I'm not going to become a regular to this forum subsection.