Let's not forget that an interfaith group, Canadians United Against Hate, that planned to commenorate in Ottawa the anniversary of the Quebec City Mosque shooting cancelled this today because of the potential for violence with the small but exteme elements of the convoy. One demonstration should not lead to the cancellation of another because of fear of violence.
So what are you implying? No one else can protest? This is called divisional politics. You are trying to imply that some people are more important than others. You know who was really good at that? The British empire. Don't believe me? See India Pakistan relations.
You either misread what I wrote or deliberately distorted it. "One demonstration should not lead to the cancellation of another because of fear of violence" means that both should be able to occur on the same day at Parliament with one demonstration having to decide to not hold their demonstration because a small minority from the other demonstration have been issuing threats of right-wing violence.
No sorry you misread the phrase "divisional politics" Nice try to shift the narrative away. I remember seeing clips a few weeks ago of Justin doing an interview in French where he suggests that people who do not want to inject their bodies with a foreign substance (demonized as anti vaxers), suggesting that some are white supremist or racists. I found this to be a real ironic statement from a proven white racist (blackface brownface) I guess, according the the now common and well documented narrative of the ICM, white racists are only the people the ICM wants to marginilize and demonize. And not the known proven and documented white racists that support the ICM narrative. Divisional politics. Karl and a couple other rabble writers have become real good at this!
