Stretching my brain, Thomas Mann and Vlad Vexler

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
Pondering
Stretching my brain, Thomas Mann and Vlad Vexler

I listened to this at 1.25 because I have no patience but then 3/4s of the way through I disagreed but at the same time agree.  His argument is that we are all responsible for what our country does which I disagreed with because I don't feel that I have any power over what the government does.

He's Russian and talks about the war but more philosophically. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1pOahq4TCk&ab_channel=VladVexler

Why All Russians Are Responsible for Putin's War

He opens with Thomas Mann who I never heard of but I am sure many of you have. He wrote an essay entitled "That Man is my Brother" then changed it to "Brother Hitler". 

But he isn't referring to guilt by association. He is referring to political responsibility by association. He isn't denying that Hitler was radical evil rather he is saying look lets not face evil with our back to it instead lets sit there and ask ourselves look even though I am not to blame how am I responsible for this? (This is  allVlad explaining Mann not me) Then he moves on to another essay written later.

He argued that there isn't a bad Germany and a good Germany. You can't claim Beethovan then deny Hitler. You can't claim Tolstoy then deny Putin. He says Russians are not citizens but a kind of population living on a shared territory a population that's outsourced its politics and instead just prioritized and focused on pesonal substinence. 

It's when people strive to be morally good in a narrow sphere but in a wider sphere they are completely morally absent. Then he cuts to another man talking about thin relations and thick relations which boils down to we care about the people in our immediate circle. People think as long as they make their thick world a better place their thin world doesn't really matter. That's wrong because the thin world can eventually impact your thick world. 

He says Russians lack a shared civic space so they only care about their territory. (This reminded me of LNR and DNR refusing to fight for each other's territories, I did wonder why they didn't work together.) People in St. Petersburg and Moscow are kind of protected from the war. Few soldiers come from there so they don't have coffins arriving. Because there is a lack of civic belonging they don't feel impacted by the invasion. 

Mann wasn't just talking about Germany he was talking about the capacity of cultures to bring out the worst or the best in their inhabitants. The lesson is do not divide your country into good and bad simplistically but try to say it is all within me because it is one country not two no matter how divided it is. The West has stopped taking responsibility for political decisions that go against us because of how divided we are we have stopped taking political responsibility for the follies of our opponents. Ask yourself if this political leader stands against everything that you believe in how come your culture produced them?

He then goes to say the classic way to reject responsibility is to reject politics which is what Russia did. 

 

 

Pondering

Having done all that I was too tired to give my opinion(s).

I'm happy and grateful to live in Canada. I suppose traveling outside the country I might feel pride in saying I'm from a country that has such a high if undeserved reputation but not a personal pride as if I had anything to do with it. I feel lucky to be Canadian.  

I don't feel proud to be Canadian and I have deliberately cultivated that not to escape responsibility but to escape nationalism. I have nothing to do with the success of Celine Dion or Margaret Atwood or any other famous Canadians. "My culture" didn't create them. On this I go with Trudeau that Canada must build on mutual values. My culture is multiculturalism even though I live in Quebec. 

If we say the culture we are a part of denotes personal responsibility then that would make the various cultural communities in Canada responsible for the behaviors of members of their community which promotes racism or religious condemnation. 

As an atheist I do tend to hold religions responsible but their leaders not necessarily their followers. Be it culture or religion we are usually born into them. Not everyone is a critical thinker. 

Within the video he dismisses time constraints of work and family as freeing us from responsibility for what our country does. I don't think the word "responsibility" is helpful as it implies blame which I don't think is constructive even though he detaches "guilt" from political responsibility. I vote because my parents taught me that it was a civic duty to vote. 

Some people reject their upbringing but had I been born into a religeous right-wing family instead of an atheist centrist family it is likely that I would have a different set of beliefs like a greater emphasis on personal responsibility and rejection of government interference that decides how charitable I am through social programs. I might agree that life begins at birth and be horrified that women are murdering their babies. Abortion for non-medical reasons does mean that people who would otherwise have existed don't.

Some combination of nature/nurture/change experiences creates people who break away from the beliefs of their childhoods to one degree or another and choose a different path but that isn't the norm. There is some evolution from one generation to the next but the basics usually don't change that much. 

I have a gazillion thoughts bouncing around about the connections between responsibility blame and guilt.